Everything Compass Does

Task-based AI navigation audits that show you exactly what's blocking discovery — and what to fix.

💡 The demos below aren't sales mockups — they're real UI components lifted from Compass with sample data.

Core capabilities

Task-based auditing

Define what you want AI to accomplish on your site — "find pricing", "locate returns policy", "reach support" — and Compass tests whether it can.

  • 140+ pre-built tasks across industries
  • Universal, SaaS, E-commerce, Content, Financial, Healthcare, Enterprise categories
  • Customise existing tasks for specific verticals, topics, or locales
  • Create completely bespoke tasks for your unique needs

Select Tasks

Choose what you want the AI agent to find on your site

Find pricing information
Find contact information
Find about/company information
3 tasks selected

Hybrid navigation engine

Not a simple crawler. Compass uses ML to pre-filter link candidates and an LLM to make authentic navigation decisions — the same way real AI agents work.

  • XGBoost pre-filtering for efficient link selection
  • Claude-powered navigation decisions
  • Two strategy modes: homepage navigation vs. search-first
  • Real-time visibility into agent reasoning

Running Audit

acme-saas.com

0:18
Task 2/5:Find contact page
Site Search
"acme-saas contact"
Homepage
...
Homepage Nav
Homepage
...
Completed:
Find pricing informationclean

Failure classification

When something fails, Compass tells you exactly why — not just "couldn't find it" but the specific failure mode so you know what to fix.

  • Blocked: robots.txt, authentication, paywalls
  • Navigation failures: buried links, confusing menus
  • Depth failures: too many steps to reach content
  • Content gaps: genuinely missing information
4 issues found
Blocked JS Nav Depth
Server Response:
403 Forbidden - Bot detected

Page blocked by bot detection. Server returned 403 Forbidden when accessed without browser fingerprint.

Fix: Review bot protection rules. Consider allowlisting known AI user agents (Googlebot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-Web) for documentation pages.
Strategy: BothUser-agent blocked

Step-by-step navigation traces

See exactly what the agent saw, which links it considered, why it chose each path, and where it got stuck.

  • Full navigation path visualisation
  • ML scores and SHAP feature importance
  • LLM reasoning for each decision
  • Link-by-link candidate ranking
Navigation Trace: Find pricing2 steps
ML scored
LLM chose
0
Homepage
acme-saas.com
15612
ML 45msLLM 892ms
LLM Reasoning

""Pricing" link is the most direct match for finding pricing information. Located in primary navigation with high text similarity score (0.42). Choosing over "Plans & Pricing" due to cleaner URL path."

1
Pricing
acme-saas.com/pricing
898
ML 38msLLM 654ms
LLM Reasoning

"Task complete. Current page displays pricing tiers with monthly/annual pricing ($29/mo Starter, $79/mo Pro, $199/mo Enterprise). All information needed is present on this page."

2✓ Found
Task Complete
acme-saas.com/pricing
LLM Reasoning

"Navigation successful. Found pricing information in 2 steps (Homepage → Pricing)."

Why "Pricing" scored 2.84
/pricing
Text match
+42%
Main nav
+28%
URL match
+18%
Prominence
+12%
Semantic
+8%

Actionable recommendations

Every audit produces specific, prioritised fixes with estimated impact scores — not generic advice but targeted improvements.

  • Potential score calculation shows improvement ceiling
  • Prioritised by impact on AI readiness
  • Specific page and element references
  • Implementation guidance for each fix
0AI Ready
Coverage
0%
Accessibility
0%
Navigation
0%
Accessibility issues detected. Navigation limiting score.
Potential:86(+32 points)
Top Recommendationsby impact
3,348+

Real data foundation

Navigation traces used to train our models, across 250 sites and 494,197 links analysed.

140+

Industry task packs

Pre-built tasks covering Universal, SaaS, E-commerce, Content, Financial, Healthcare, and Enterprise sites.

Multi-site

Project management

Organise audits by project. Track multiple domains, compare results over time, manage client work.

Full

Audit history

Every audit saved with complete results. Compare changes, track improvements, demonstrate progress.

Coming soon

We're actively building. Here's what's on the roadmap.

Multi-tenant accounts

Team workspaces with role-based access and audit assignment.

Scheduled audits

Automated recurring audits to catch regressions before they impact visibility.

Why we test full navigation paths

Most AI tools can't actually browse — they land from search and that's it. Compass uses browser automation to test complete navigation paths, giving you an optimistic ceiling on your AI accessibility. If your site fails in Compass, it'll definitely fail in the real world.

How it works under the hood

Compass uses a hybrid ML+LLM architecture designed to simulate how real AI agents navigate websites.

The navigation pipeline

  1. Page analysis: When Compass lands on a page, it extracts all navigable elements — links, buttons, form fields, interactive components.
  2. ML pre-filtering: An XGBoost model trained on 494,197 links scores each candidate based on text, position, and context. This narrows thousands of links to the most promising candidates.
  3. LLM decision: Claude evaluates the shortlist against the task goal and selects the best navigation action, providing reasoning for each choice.
  4. Result classification: After each step, ML models classify the outcome — success, partial progress, or failure with specific category.

Why hybrid?

Pure LLM navigation is expensive and slow. Pure ML can't handle the semantic reasoning needed for complex navigation decisions. The hybrid approach gives us the best of both: efficient filtering with intelligent decision-making.

Training data

Our models are trained on 3,348 real navigation traces across 250 websites. Not synthetic benchmarks — actual agent behaviour from production systems.

Ready to audit your site?

See what AI agents can — and can't — find.